JBL Boombox 3 vs Partybox 110

JBL is a well-known manufacturer of audio products, and it is offering two popular speakers that are Partybox 110 and the Boombox 3. Both speakers offer impressive features and sound quality, but you might be curious about which one is superior. Here on this blog of Digimigia, we have a comprehensive review comparing the features and audio performance of JBL Boombox 3 vs Partybox 110.
Design and Portability
When comparing the two speakers, the initial factors to evaluate are their design and construction quality. JBL speakers are recognized because of their sturdy design and long-lasting durability, and this applies to both Boombox 3 and Partybox 110.
The Boombox 3 offers greater portability, featuring a silicone construction and weighing just 6.74 kg. While it lacks LED lights found in its rival, it boasts an IP67 rating, ensuring it is fully resistant to dust and water for portability option.
In contrast, the JBL Partybox 110 features a robust construction and has a weight of approximately 10.84 kg. It includes an LED light that enhances the speaker’s overall aesthetic. Furthermore, this speaker boasts an IPX4 rating, indicating that it is resistant to rain and splashes.

Portability Comparison
Both speakers are excellent for outdoor use, but after testing their durability, we found that the Boombox 3 will be the better option because of its full dust and water resistance. Additionally, the Boombox 3 offers a brighter sound profile and a Partyboost feature that lets you connect multiple compatible speakers for louder playback, making it ideal for outdoor environments. The JBL Boombox 3 vs Partybox 110 portability can be a great choice for hiking and road trips due to its portability. However, after testing it, the results show that it is superior to the Partybox 110 because it is lighter, more compact, and has a sturdier design that withstands rough terrain.
Additionally, the JBL Partybox 110 speaker boasts an impressive 24-hour battery life, while it is making it perfect for extended journeys. It also features a built-in power bank to recharge your phone when necessary.

Sound Performance
One of the important JBL boombox 3 vs Partybox 110 specs is the sound quality. The Partybox 110 features dual upward-firing subwoofers and tweeters, while the Boombox 3 includes dual upward-firing tweeters positioned above the woofers, enhancing the dual passive radiators that project sound from the sides. A sound test on both speakers at 81% volume was shown that the Partybox 110’s bass boost set to deep and the Boombox 3 using its standard EQ settings. Both speakers have impressive sound quality, but the JBL Boombox 3 vs Partybox 110 sound quality stands out with a louder and more pronounced sound profile. It highlights mids and trebles, and features an adjustable equalizer that lets users customize the bass, mids, and trebles to their liking. A notable advantage of the Boombox 3 is its Partyboost feature, which allows it to connect with multiple speakers for synchronized playback.
In contrast, the Partybox 110 offers a more balanced sound profile in similar tests, providing strong bass along with well-rounded mids and highs. While it lacks the Partyboost feature for linking speakers, it does include an RCA jack, enabling connection with another Partybox 110 to create a stereo setup. Based on the test results, the Partybox 110 offers superior audio quality in comparison with the Boombox 3. JBL Boombox 3 vs Partybox 110 watts also offers an impressive 180W of power in AC mode while it is surpassing the JBL PartyBox 110’s 160W RMS output.

Features and Connectivity
Partybox 110 and Boombox 3 are both Bluetooth speakers, but Boombox 3 is equipped with Bluetooth 5.3, a more advanced version than the Bluetooth 5.1 found in Partybox 110. Both speakers can connect to two devices at the same time, but Boombox 3 offers a superior connectivity range, it provides lag-free audio, and connects faster. The connectivity range of both speakers by moving the audio source away could maintain lag-free audio up to 32 feet.
Additionally, both speakers support a wired connection through an AUX input, while it is allowing them to connect to devices. However, Partybox 110 has an advantage with its microphone and guitar inputs, that is making it an excellent option for karaoke parties.

Battery Life
Now, let’s discuss about the battery life of JBL Partybox 110 vs Boombox 3. The JBL Partybox 110 vs Boombox 3 has a battery life of 12 hours and takes 3.5 hours to charge, while the Boombox 3 has a battery life of 24 hours with a charging time of 6.5 hours. We tested the battery life of both speakers separately and found that the PartyBox 110 lasts 12 hours if the music is played slightly above 20%, the light feature is off, and the mega bass is on. However, when the light feature is on, the bass boost is set to deep, and the volume is at 65%, the battery life drops to 8 hours.
In a similar test, the Boombox 3 managed to last 24 hours of battery life with music at 50% volume, which is a good volume and it is significantly better than the PartyBox 110 at 20 or 30% volume. Lastly, both speakers come with a built-in power bank, allowing users to charge their devices from the speaker in case of an emergency.
Price
In terms of price, we should say that PartyBox 110 vs Boombox 3 is a more affordable choice, because it is priced around 70-80$ lower than Boombox3, which makes it a budget-friendly option. However, The Boombox 3 offers several bright features such as a longer battery life, an IP67 rating, and improved durability.
Conclusion
After comparing JBL Boombox 3 vs Partybox 110 in this blog on Digimigia, we conducted that the Partybox 110 stands out as a strong contender, while it is offering superior sound quality, impressive battery life, and a variety of connectivity options. Despite these advantages, it falls short due to its overly bright sound profile, which highlights high-frequency notes and it can become harsh at elevated volumes. JBL Boombox 3 vs Partybox 110 price is also more expensive choice, which doesn’t make it a budget-friendly option.